The Khalistan motion and Hindu nationalism have been described as new bureaucracy of extremism in the United Kingdom, according to a report through the disclosed.

Last year, the British internal secretary, Yvette Cooper, announced an examination of government policy on extremism. She said the exam, nicknamed “fast analytical sprint”, “cartography would do it and monitor extremist trends” and offer “a new strategic technique to counteract extremism. “

As per the leaked report of the review to the think tank Policy Exchange, the review listed nine types of extremism in the UK: Islamist; extreme right wing; extreme misogyny; pro-Khalistan extremism; Hindu nationalist extremism; environmental extremism; Left wing, anarchist and single-issue extremism; violence fascination and conspiracy theories. Notably, misogyny, Khalistan movement, and Hindu nationalism have been featured as new threats.

While the mirrored imagery organization said the House of Representatives examination informs Hindu nationalism, it reported that the examination underscores Islamist extremism even as it continues to push for maximum attacks and terrorist instances with British authorities.

The communal violence between Hindu and Muslim communities in England’s Leicester in 2022 is the driver of Hindu nationalism’s inclusion in the Home Office’s review, according to the Policy Exchange.

The 30 -page report of the image organization reflected in the revealed review of the Interior Office described Hindu nationalism as a “underestimated topic” that the Ministry of Interior undoubtedly approached for the first time in detail. He said to examine a separate exam from a government program that attacks extremism in 2023 an error.

“Given the violence that occurred in Leicester in September 2022 between Hindus and Muslims, the government is right to put Hindu nationalist extremism in the spotlight, especially as the wisdom is weak,” the report states.

Even as the review flagged Hindu nationalism in the Leicester violence, it flagged that Muslim extremism also played a role in the episode.

The expert group noted that the Interior Ministry’s review noted that “key voices within the Muslim and Hindu communities have also played a role in exploiting tensions opportunistically and inciting hatred among local communities. “

As for the Khalistan extremism, the review said that Khalistan’s motion consistent with Se is extremist, but “the challenge is when this attitude leads to the defense of violence in this cause,” according to the group of experts.

The Khalistan movement seeks to carve out a separate state for Sikhs from India with the secession of Punjab. For decades, the movement waged a terrorist movement in India that killed thousands. The movement ebbed in the 1990s in India. Even though the violent movement ebbed in India, it found safe havens abroad, most notably in Canada but also in the United Kingdom. From there, Khalistani elements have continued to lobby foreign governments to act against India. They have also planned terrorist attacks and led a host of criminal activities inside India from there. They have also attacked Indian diplomatic missions there.

The tank said that the position of the review of the Ministry of Interior as “makes sense. “

The think further said that the review has assessed that there is a “growing portfolio of actors of concern” within the Khalistan movement. It also said that the review has flagged Khalistani leaders’ “demonisation of Muslim communities, in particular in relation to child sexual exploitation allegations”.

The review has also flagged the conspiracy theories by Khalistani groups of purported collusion between the British and Indian governments, according to the think tank.

The reflected image organization also said that the exam also reports the alleged violent activities of Indian governments opposed to Sikhs in Canada and the United Kingdom. The Indian government has rejected such accusations and rather stressed the political interference of foreign elements in India, specifically through the outgoing Canadian prime minister, Justin Trudeau, that the Indian government accused of having reached Khalistani’s motion for a Internal internal political matrix

The policy exchange report said the Interior Ministry underestimated Islamist extremism.

Even as Islamist extremism remains the biggest security threat, the review devotes only one page, the same area faithful to conspiracy theories, Khalistan extremism, misogyny, and environmental extremism, according to the thinking.

Knowledge suggests that Islamism is the main concentrate of the Ministry of Interior, according to the group of experts.

Over the more than 25 years, Islamist extremism is to blame for 94% of all deaths through terrorism and 80% of police counter-terrorism cases last year were rooted in Islamist extremism, 75% of MI5 topics were rooted in Islamist extremism and 63% of custodial terrorists were connected to Islamist acts. according to government data.

The Policy Exchange flags that one reason why Islamism is the biggest threat to the UK is because of its institutional nature.

“The explanation of why Islamism is the serious extremist risk of Great Britain is that it has a much greater institutional presence than any other form of British extremism, influencing or controlling safe mosques, personal schools, the media, the media , beneficial organizations and tension groups.

The review also “ignores the roles of institutions in spreading and incubating extremism, and particularly ignores the significant power of institutions in Islamist extremism”, as per the think tank’s report.

A question that is overlooked in the exam is the risk of calling for violence organized by Islamists who oppose the so -called insults to Islam, which they describe as blasphemy. The reservoir report reported the case of an instructor who has been Hidden for 4 years after the risk of insulting Islam was opposed. Instructor was killed in 2020 for a discussion about the elegance of cartoons.